THE AESTHETIC EDUCATION OF MAN, (1ST LETTER - 5TH LETTER)

        Schiller was a German poet, philosopher, historian, and author drama.Schiller and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe frequently discussed issues related to aesthetics, Schiller and Goethe many complete his work by leaving a sketch. This relationship and these discussions led to a period now referred to by the Weimar Classicism.Dalam book Aesthetic Education Of Man by Freidrich Schiller, Schiller tells the story about the renovation and development of Kant's doctrine of basic education has developed estetik.He art by clear and convincing people about the beauty of life.

            Schiller has been researching his book on beauty and art in addition to treating the subject from the moral nobility of character will not bear manusia.He state error for a good action we.idea Schiller had drawn, but not in depth from reciting or from experience.we more subservient to natural disadvantages of maintaining themselves by acts authorities.We so because they had no confidence in the main diri.Idea in the practical system in which Kant philosophers do not agree with him and Schiller stated that he never did begitu.However, Kantian principle is not restricted thoughts . this is because the actions and thought they would say such a law in the books that say "think on your own unlimited will determine the law according to which we have to continue.

Schiller said he will appear as unseasonable to go in search of the code for the world'smoral world estetik.schiller states offer useful things higher, and when the spirit ofphilosophical inquiry was challenged by the circumstances of our times to occupythemselves with the most perfect of all works seni.bagi large trade in the principles ofsocial and moral it was a matter of concern to every human being, on the grounds that the two subjects and the results itu.tambahannya again, as men who between them have a family member, a party to the case in under trial and involved more or less in decision making. It would appear that this great political process not only involved with individualcases, it also states enactments, which he as a rational spirit capable of enunciating and entitled to melafazkan.He not without bringing menbuktikan he to remember about the principles by based on political reasons in the legislation.

as a normal human we have different ideas and never be satisfied as well have a different view of beauty compared to women. Based on the sentence he can change thejob requirements in free solution and enhance the physical requirements in the law longmoral.Kini natural conditions can be applied to every political body which owes its establishment originally to forces and not the rule law, and this was contrary to the moralnature of man, as lawful only have power over this. . So when the press because its natural state, as it should if he wants to replace his own, he is the real physical weight ofthe moral man in trouble, he weight to the possibility of the existence of society, evenmorally necessary, ideal society.

  Schiller said that the ideal man must be a genuine person who has many ideas as well asopen the mind and the mind to think for and value of art from around.we have two waysavailable to them to thinking, where people can agree upon a time man of ideas, and there are two ways in which the government can sustain itself in the individual. One way iswhen the pure ideal man subdues the empirical man, and the state for individuals, oronce again when the individual is a state, and human time to the man ennobled idea.thetake effect when the cause of moral unity into physical society does he have to injure the manifold in nature. When nature strives to maintain the character of the moral structure ofmanifold, it does not need to make any breach in moral unity.

              he said the egotism was founded in the bosom of the refined society, and withoutdeveloping even a sociable character, we feel all the contagions and miseries of society. We subject our free judgment to the opinion wrong, our sense of the strangecustoms, and wants us to seductions. We only maintain our caprice suci.Manusia rights of the world have contracted by his pride and satisfaction, while human nature oftenbeats in sympathy, and every man seeks for nothing more than to save property fromdestruction of public calamity, as it is from some time kebakarasemangat seen tohesitate between perversions and savagism, between what is unusual, and only,between superstition and moral unbelief, and it is often anything but balance that setslimits to evil...

            In conclusion, the art has its own creativity in which the only person who can say theirconscience will be merasainya.bagi only through an independent state withoutrestrictions by the law other.only low can overcome great power politics that happens notjust to otherpeople in masyarakattice in the field of morals.